While acting is uniformly top notch throughout, Fuhrman spectacularly establishes herself as one of the most remarkable young talents currently working in cinema, and that's a statement not to be taken lightly. All of which forms a basis for familial tension, further compounded by the skeletons of Kate's history of alcoholism and John's past infidelity.Telling a surprisingly layered story that strays into uncomfortable territory given how it deals with children in peril, the shiniest gem in this entertaining nugget is that of Isabelle Fuhrman, upon whose performance the movie succeeds or fails. She quickly forms a bond with Max Aryana Engineer, the couple's deaf daughter, by learning sign language, but is resented by their son Daniel Jimmy Bennett who views her with contempt. ĭecision motivated in part by the stillborn birth of their third child.An oddball from the start, Esther at first charms the Colemans with her personality, artistic flair, and independence, however it's apparent that there's more going on with Esther than meets the eye.
The phenomenal child performances alone are enough to recommend Orphan. If you were still interested or if you're a horror fan that is able to look past some clichés and logical jumps in exchange for horrific chills, you'll have a fun time. The basic idea is nothing new except for the unexpected twist, but you knew that from the trailer and synopsis. This is a ballsy film that throws kids into horrific ordeals.It may be a "B" movie, but it's a damn good one that knows its audience. The violence committed by and toward children is shocking, realistic, and brutal. Esther is multi-dimensional and even sympathetic at times - I would love to see a prequel based on her character.Orphan is definitely not for kids - aside from the "anti-adoption" angle, there is plenty of dangerous imitable behavior. It's also a bit long at 2 hours - for an exploitative "B" movie this is unusual, although time is devoted to character development. There is a talky scene where Esther reveals herself to her adoptive mother that is totally unneeded, as well as a crucial line regarding Danny, the older son, which really should've been cut. The last part of the movie becomes a slasher flick replete with clichés and a one-liner.
It's even more chilling and cathartic the second time around.It's far from perfect though - there are way too many predictable jump/false scares, with the soundtrack blaring to try to startle the viewer. I was able to focus more on details and clues, and the anticipation of my favorite scenes made for a much more rewarding experience. The film improves upon second viewing, with the knowledge of the twist. One guy commented afterwards: "I never get scared by movies but that was the scariest movie I've ever seen." Audience participation for both screenings I went to were very high. They were collectively screaming, cheering, yelling at the screen, cringing, applauding, and enthusiastically welcoming the comic relief. The second showing I went to was just as receptive - the audience went nuts. When the credits rolled the audience even applauded. There are plenty of fun and playful tension-relieving scenes, and several cathartic moments when the audience erupted into cheers.
#ORPHAN MOVIE TRUE STORY HOW TO#
Collet-Serra knows how to pull the strings and engage the audience, as they were screaming and laughing at all the right moments. I saw Orphan at a packed advance screening and the audience had a blast. The stylish cinematography, editing, and sound are fantastic as well.